martedì 30 giugno 2026
New on TikTok: الحماية الخاصة بعد مرسوم كوترو: محكمة بولونيا تؤكد أهمية الاندماج والحياة الخاصة مرحباً بكم في حلقة جديدة من بودكاست قانون الهجرة. أنا المحامي فابيو لوسيربو. نتحدث اليوم عن قرارين مهمين أصدرتهما محكمة بولونيا بتاريخ 22 مايو 2026. ويؤكد هذان القراران مبدأً قد يكون له تأثير كبير على العديد من قضايا الحماية الخاصة التي لا تزال منظورة أمام المحاكم الإيطالية. تتعلق القضيتان بمواطنين مغربيين رُفضت طلباتهما للحصول على الحماية الدولية من قبل اللجنة الإقليمية المختصة. إلا أن المحكمة، أثناء نظرها في الدعويين، وجدت أن كليهما نجح في بناء حياة حقيقية ومستقرة في إيطاليا من خلال العمل المنتظم، والسكن المستقل، والعلاقات الاجتماعية، واحترام قوانين الدولة الإيطالية. وتكمن أهمية هذين القرارين في استناد المحكمة إلى قرار محكمة النقض الإيطالية رقم 13309 لسنة 2025. فقد أكدت المحكمة أن مرسوم كوترو لم يُلغِ حماية الحياة الخاصة والعائلية للأجانب. وحتى بعد التعديلات التشريعية التي أُدخلت عام 2023، ما زالت السلطات ملزمة باحترام الالتزامات الدستورية والدولية عند تقييم أوضاع الأشخاص المقيمين في إيطاليا. وأوضح القضاة أن الشخص الذي بنى حياته في إيطاليا من خلال العمل والعلاقات الاجتماعية والاستقرار المعيشي قد يتعرض لضرر جسيم إذا أُجبر على مغادرة البلاد. فالإبعاد أو الترحيل قد يشكل انتهاكاً للحق في الحياة الخاصة والعائلية المنصوص عليه في المادة الثامنة من الاتفاقية الأوروبية لحقوق الإنسان، وكذلك للمبادئ الأساسية الواردة في الدستور الإيطالي. ولا يقتصر التقييم على وجود عقد عمل فقط، بل يشمل مجمل مسار الاندماج الاجتماعي والإنساني الذي حققه الشخص في إيطاليا. في القضية الأولى، أخذت المحكمة بعين الاعتبار سنوات من العمل في قطاع البناء، ووجود مسكن مستقل، والحصول على رخصة قيادة إيطالية. أما في القضية الثانية، فقد اعتبرت المحكمة أن عقد العمل الدائم، والالتحاق بدورات اللغة الإيطالية، ووجود سكن مستقل، وعدم وجود سوابق جنائية أو مخالفات، كلها عناصر تؤكد اندماج الشخص في المجتمع الإيطالي. وبناءً على هذه المعطيات، أقرت محكمة بولونيا حق كلا المتقاضيين في الحصول على تصريح إقامة للحماية الخاصة لمدة سنتين قابل للتجديد ويتيح لهما العمل بشكل قانوني في إيطاليا. تؤكد هذه الأحكام أن الاندماج ما زال عاملاً أساسياً في تقييم طلبات الحماية الخاصة، وأن الحق في الحياة الخاصة والعائلية لا يزال يتمتع بحماية قانونية قوية حتى بعد دخول مرسوم كوترو حيز التنفيذ. شكراً لكم على الاستماع إلى هذه الحلقة من بودكاست قانون الهجرة. معكم المحامي فابيو لوسيربو، وإلى اللقاء في حلقة جديدة حول آخر مستجدات قانون الهجرة. https://ift.tt/F7igAOc https://ift.tt/D5a31XG https://ift.tt/cZWVL1R
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/QqESxMl
Italian Court Confirms Strict Link Between Work Permit Clearance and Employer in Residence Permit Conversions
Italian Court Confirms Strict Link Between Work Permit Clearance and Employer in Residence Permit Conversions
A recent ruling issued by the Regional Administrative Court of Emilia-Romagna has drawn attention to one of the most delicate aspects of the Italian immigration system: the relationship between the work permit clearance, known as the “nulla osta”, and the employer who initiated the immigration procedure.
The judgment, published on 21 May 2026, concerns a foreign national who had entered the Italian administrative process for the conversion of a residence permit from internship status to subordinate employment.
The case arose after the worker obtained a work permit clearance through a specific employer and signed the required residence contract before the Immigration Desk. However, the original employment relationship never actually started. The worker later began employment with a different company.
Following this change, the Immigration Office of Forlì declared the application for the work residence permit inadmissible, arguing that the employer who initiated the procedure and signed the residence contract was not the same employer who ultimately hired the foreign worker.
The Administrative Court upheld the position of the authorities.
According to the judges, the Italian immigration framework requires continuity between the employer requesting the work permit clearance, the residence contract, and the actual employment relationship established with the foreign national.
The Court also stressed that this interpretation serves a broader purpose: preventing abuses of the immigration system and avoiding situations where procedures are initiated without a genuine intention to employ the worker.
The ruling reflects a traditional approach deeply rooted in the structure of the Italian immigration system, where the employer plays a central role in sponsoring the foreign worker’s entry and regularization process.
At the same time, the decision highlights the growing tension between rigid administrative procedures and the realities of the modern labour market.
Today’s employment landscape is often unstable and highly flexible. Temporary contracts, subcontracting systems, business closures, and rapid job changes are increasingly common. In this context, tying a foreign worker’s immigration status too strictly to a single employer may create significant vulnerabilities.
Interestingly, the Court placed considerable emphasis on one specific detail: the applicant had failed to provide any concrete explanation regarding why the original employment relationship had never started.
This aspect may prove decisive in future litigation.
A foreign worker who can properly document the reasons behind a change of employer — while demonstrating continuity of employment and social integration — could potentially distinguish his or her case from the restrictive interpretation adopted in this judgment.
The ruling therefore sends a clear message to both foreign workers and immigration lawyers: in Italy’s current administrative framework, the procedural consistency of the “nulla osta” pathway remains a central issue in residence permit conversions.
Avv. Fabio Loscerbo
ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0004-7030-0428
lunedì 29 giugno 2026
New on TikTok: Special Protection After the Cutro Decree: The Bologna Court Confirms the Importance of Integration and Private Life Welcome to a new episode of the Immigration Law podcast. My name is Fabio Loscerbo, and I am an immigration lawyer. Today we will discuss two important decisions issued by the Bologna Court on May 22, 2026. These rulings confirm a principle that could have a significant impact on many pending special protection cases in Italy. The cases involved two Moroccan citizens whose applications for international protection had been rejected by the Territorial Commission. However, during the court proceedings, a crucial fact emerged: both individuals had built a genuine life in Italy through regular employment, stable housing, social relationships, and compliance with Italian laws. The most significant aspect of these decisions is the Court's reliance on Italian Supreme Court ruling number 13309 of 2025. According to the Bologna Court, the Cutro Decree did not eliminate the protection of a foreign national's private and family life. Even after the 2023 legislative reforms, constitutional and international obligations still require authorities to consider a person's level of integration into Italian society. The judges emphasized that the more a person has established their life in Italy, the more serious the consequences of removal may be. Such removal can violate the right to private and family life protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as fundamental principles of the Italian Constitution. The assessment is not limited to employment alone but includes the overall social, personal, and family integration achieved in Italy. In the first case, the Court considered years of employment in the construction sector, independent housing, and the achievement of an Italian driving licence. In the second case, the Court highlighted a permanent employment contract, attendance at Italian language courses, autonomous housing, and the absence of any criminal record or negative conduct. Based on these factors, the Bologna Court granted both applicants a two-year renewable special protection residence permit, allowing them to work legally in Italy. These decisions confirm that integration remains a key factor in special protection cases and that the right to private and family life continues to play a central role even under the legal framework introduced after the Cutro Decree. Thank you for listening to this episode of the Immigration Law podcast. I am Fabio Loscerbo, and I look forward to seeing you in the next episode. https://ift.tt/2KmrncX https://ift.tt/yw5Qxq2 https://ift.tt/6ywrMIE
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/gbRrSZn
Special Protection After the Cutro Decree: The Bologna Court Confirms the Importance of Integration and Private Life Welcome to a new episode of the Immigration Law podcast. My name is Fabio Loscerbo, and I am an immigration lawyer. Today we will discuss two important decisions issued by the Bologna Court on May 22, 2026. These rulings confirm a principle that could have a significant impact on many pending special protection cases in Italy. The cases involved two Moroccan citizens whose applications for international protection had been rejected by the Territorial Commission. However, during the court proceedings, a crucial fact emerged: both individuals had built a genuine life in Italy through regular employment, stable housing, social relationships, and compliance with Italian laws. The most significant aspect of these decisions is the Court's reliance on Italian Supreme Court ruling number 13309 of 2025. According to the Bologna Court, the Cutro Decree did not eliminate the protection of a foreign national's private and family life. Even after the 2023 legislative reforms, constitutional and international obligations still require authorities to consider a person's level of integration into Italian society. The judges emphasized that the more a person has established their life in Italy, the more serious the consequences of removal may be. Such removal can violate the right to private and family life protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as fundamental principles of the Italian Constitution. The assessment is not limited to employment alone but includes the overall social, personal, and family integration achieved in Italy. In the first case, the Court considered years of employment in the construction sector, independent housing, and the achievement of an Italian driving licence. In the second case, the Court highlighted a permanent employment contract, attendance at Italian language courses, autonomous housing, and the absence of any criminal record or negative conduct. Based on these factors, the Bologna Court granted both applicants a two-year renewable special protection residence permit, allowing them to work legally in Italy. These decisions confirm that integration remains a key factor in special protection cases and that the right to private and family life continues to play a central role even under the legal framework introduced after the Cutro Decree. Thank you for listening to this episode of the Immigration Law podcast. I am Fabio Loscerbo, and I look forward to seeing you in the next episode. Special Protection After the Cutro Decree: The Bologna Court Confirms the Importance of Integration and Private Life Welcome to a new episode of the Immigration Law podcast. My name is Fabio Loscerbo, and I am an immigration lawyer. Today we will discuss two important decisions issued by the Bologna Court on May 22, 2026. These rulings confirm a principle that could have a significant impact on many pending special protection cases in Italy. The cases involved two Moroccan citizens whose applications for international protection had been rejected by the Territorial Commission. However, during the court proceedings, a crucial fact emerged: both individuals had built a genuine life in Italy through regular employment, stable housing, social relationships, and compliance with Italian laws. The most significant aspect of these decisions is the Court's reliance on Italian Supreme Court ruling number 13309 of 2025. According to the Bologna Court, the Cutro Decree did not eliminate the protection of a foreign national's private and family life. Even after the 2023 legislative reforms, constitutional and international obligations still require authorities to consider a person's level of integration into Italian society. The judges emphasized that the more a person has established their life in Italy, the more serious the consequences of removal may be. Such removal can violate the right to private and family life protected by Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights, as well as fundamental principles of the Italian Constitution. The assessment is not limited to employment alone but includes the overall social, personal, and family integration achieved in Italy. In the first case, the Court considered years of employment in the construction sector, independent housing, and the achievement of an Italian driving licence. In the second case, the Court highlighted a permanent employment contract, attendance at Italian language courses, autonomous housing, and the absence of any criminal record or negative conduct. Based on these factors, the Bologna Court granted both applicants a two-year renewable special protection residence permit, allowing them to work legally in Italy. These decisions confirm that integration remains a key factor in special protection cases and that the right to private and family life continues to play a central role even under the legal framework introduced after the Cutro Decree. Thank you for listening to this episode of the Immigration Law podcast. I am Fabio Loscerbo, and I look forward to seeing you in the next episode. https://ift.tt/yw5Qxq2 https://p16-common-sign.tiktokcdn-eu.com/tos-no1a-p-0037-no/owAVDEgxIXqD8cCHQB8BMkF3VHMFeFfn4bAIbQ~tplv-tiktokx-cropcenter-q:300:400:q70.jpeg?dr=9232&refresh_token=4e191308&x-expires=1782885600&x-signature=pqvgabNbr3NGEGFVrWDfsubjQcg%3D&t=bacd0480&ps=933b5bde&shp=d05b14bd&shcp=8aecc5ac&idc=no1a&s=TIKTOK_FOR_DEVELOPER&sc=cover&biz_tag=tt_video
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/gbRrSZn
Un travailleur peut-il perdre son autorisation de travail à cause des erreurs de son employeur ?
Un travailleur peut-il perdre son autorisation de travail à cause des erreurs de son employeur ? by Avv. Fabio Loscerbo
https://ift.tt/0KPRFHB
via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frlT0mtsQe4
https://ift.tt/0KPRFHB
via YouTube https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frlT0mtsQe4
domenica 28 giugno 2026
Diritto dell'Immigrazione - La segnalazione nel Sistema d'Informazione Schengen e il dovere di motivazione del diniego di visto: osservazioni a margine della sentenza del Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio, Sezione https://ift.tt/WKIvVGB Fabio Loscerbo di: Fabio Loscerbo in: La segnalazione nel Sistema d'Informazione Schengen e il dovere di motivazione del diniego di visto: osservazioni a margine della sentenza del Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio, Sezione
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/TeAWb2n
Bologna Court Confirms Special Protection Rights Despite Italy’s Cutro Decree https://ift.tt/dCeuLGo Bologna Court Confirms Special Protection Rights Despite Italy’s Cutro Decree Bologna, Italy – Two important decisions issued by the Bologna Court on May 22, 2026, have reaffirmed that foreign nationals who have built a genuine life in Italy may still qualify for special protection residence permits, even after the restrictive reforms introduced by the so-called Cutro Decree. The rulings concerned two Moroccan nationals whose applications for international protection had been rejected by the Territorial Commission. After reviewing the cases, however, the Court concluded that both applicants had developed strong social, economic, and personal ties in Italy that made their removal incompatible with the protection of fundamental rights. The decisions are particularly significant because they rely heavily on a recent ruling of the Italian Supreme Court, decision no. 13309 of November 11, 2025. In that landmark judgment, the Supreme Court clarified that the 2023 reforms did not eliminate the protection of private and family life guaranteed under Article 8 of the European Convention on Human Rights. According to the Bologna Court, the legal framework introduced by the Cutro Decree must still be interpreted in light of Italy’s constitutional and international obligations. As a result, immigration authorities and courts remain required to assess whether a person's removal would disproportionately interfere with the private and family life established in Italy. In the first case, the Court highlighted the applicant’s continuous employment in the construction sector, his independent housing arrangement, and the fact that he had obtained an Italian driving licence. In the second case, judges emphasized a permanent employment contract, participation in Italian language courses, stable accommodation, and the absence of any criminal record. The Court stressed that integration cannot be measured solely through employment. Instead, judges must evaluate the overall reality of a person’s life in Italy, including social relationships, economic independence, community involvement, and respect for the rules of the host country. By recognizing the applicants’ right to special protection residence permits, the Bologna Court confirmed that integration remains a key factor in Italian immigration law, despite legislative efforts to narrow the scope of humanitarian-based protections. The decisions are expected to influence many pending cases throughout Italy, particularly those involving foreign nationals who have developed strong ties to Italian society while awaiting the outcome of immigration proceedings. As Italian courts continue to interpret the post-Cutro legal framework, these rulings suggest that constitutional principles and human rights obligations will remain central to the assessment of special protection claims. Fabio Loscerbo Immigration Lawyer ORCID: https://ift.tt/Y1LvUj2 https://ift.tt/8EWBwPJ
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/TeAWb2n
الحماية الخاصة بعد مرسوم كوترو: الاندماج ما زال مهماً https://ift.tt/htSpWFA https://ift.tt/yTtsSoe
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/TeAWb2n
sabato 27 giugno 2026
June 27, 2026 at 10:51AM Señalización SIS: un visado no puede ser denegado automáticamente Señalización SIS: un visado no puede ser denegado automáticamente Bienvenidos a un nuevo episodio del pódcast "Derecho de Inmigración". Soy el abogado Fabio Loscerbo. El Tribunal Administrativo Regional del Lacio, mediante la sentencia número 10641 del Registro de Sentencias, publicada el 9 de junio de 2026, ha establecido que una señalización en el Sistema de Información de Schengen, por sí sola, no basta para denegar un visado. La Administración debe explicar las razones de la decisión y garantizar el derecho de defensa del solicitante. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DLzqCvohIhc https://www.youtube.com/watch/DLzqCvohIhc
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/SAVi34I
June 27, 2026 at 10:48AM Permis de séjour et condamnations pénales : lorsque le Tribunal administratif régional rappelle Permis de séjour et condamnations pénales : lorsque le Tribunal administratif régional rappelle que les liens familiaux doivent être pris en compte Bienvenue dans un nouvel épisode du podcast « Droit de l'immigration ». Je suis Maître Fabio Loscerbo et aujourd'hui nous allons analyser une décision particulièrement importante pour toutes les personnes concernées par les procédures de délivrance ou de renouvellement d'un permis de séjour en Italie. Nous verrons pourquoi une condamnation pénale, à elle seule, ne suffit pas toujours à justifier un refus et quelles sont les obligations de l'administration lorsqu'un ressortissant étranger a construit une véritable vie familiale en Italie. L'arrêt dont nous parlons aujourd'hui a été rendu par le Tribunal administratif régional d'Émilie-Romagne, Première Chambre, le 9 juin 2026, et publié le 20 juin 2026. Il s'agit de la décision numéro 1193 du Registre des décisions, rendue dans le recours numéro 230 de l'année 2023. L'affaire concernait un ressortissant nigérian auquel la Préfecture de police de Bologne avait refusé le renouvellement de son permis de séjour en raison d'une condamnation antérieure pour une infraction liée aux stupéfiants. Selon l'administration, cette condamnation constituait, à elle seule, un motif suffisant pour refuser le renouvellement du titre de séjour. Le Tribunal rappelle cependant un principe fondamental du droit italien de l'immigration : lorsqu'un ressortissant étranger possède des liens familiaux réels et effectifs en Italie, l'administration ne peut pas se limiter à invoquer l'existence d'une condamnation pénale. Elle est tenue de procéder à une appréciation concrète de l'ensemble de la situation personnelle de l'intéressé. Dans cette affaire, le requérant avait démontré qu'il vivait de manière stable avec sa compagne et leur fille et qu'il exerçait une activité professionnelle régulière. Malgré ces éléments, présentés dès la phase administrative, la Préfecture de police ne les avait pratiquement pas examinés, se contentant d'affirmer que les observations du requérant ne justifiaient pas une décision différente. Selon le Tribunal, une telle motivation est insuffisante et contraire au droit. En s'appuyant sur la jurisprudence de la Cour constitutionnelle italienne et du Conseil d'État, la décision rappelle que l'intérêt de l'État à protéger l'ordre public doit toujours être mis en balance avec le droit au respect de la vie familiale, garanti notamment par l'article 8 de la Convention européenne des droits de l'homme. L'administration doit donc expliquer, de manière précise et circonstanciée, pourquoi, dans le cas concret, la condamnation pénale doit prévaloir sur les liens familiaux et sur le parcours d'intégration de l'intéressé. Pour ces raisons, le Tribunal administratif régional a accueilli le recours, annulé la décision de refus et ordonné à l'administration de réexaminer la demande de renouvellement du permis de séjour conformément aux principes énoncés dans cette décision. Cette décision confirme un principe essentiel du droit de l'immigration : une condamnation pénale ne peut jamais conduire automatiquement au refus d'un permis de séjour. Chaque situation doit faire l'objet d'une appréciation individualisée, tenant compte de la personne, de son histoire, de sa famille et de son degré d'intégration dans la société italienne. Je suis Maître Fabio Loscerbo. Merci d'avoir écouté ce nouvel épisode du podcast « Droit de l'immigration ». Je vous donne rendez-vous très bientôt pour un nouvel épisode consacré aux principales évolutions de la législation et de la jurisprudence en matière de droit de l'immigration. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BgQLoMmQNaQ https://www.youtube.com/watch/BgQLoMmQNaQ
via Avv. Fabio Loscerbo https://ift.tt/SAVi34I
Iscriviti a:
Post (Atom)